A few posts back, I chronicled an acrimonious target match of 1804 between two Gloucestershire volunteer rifle companies. Here, from 1811, is another instance of sharp shooting becoming sharp practice, this time pitting the metrosexual beaux of the Duke of Cumberland’s Sharpshooters and the Yagers of the prestigious Honourable Artillery Company against the stoutly rural Nottinghamshire Riflemen, a volunteer rifle club founded in 1810, and the issuers of an “all England challenge”.
The Cumberlands put in considerable practice for the match. A press report of this (my italics) is significant:
“The Duke of Cumberland’s Sharpshooters having accepted the challenge to all England from the Nottinghamshire Riflemen, to fire with ball at 200 yards, without a rest, have had two days’ practice, when much excellent shooting was exhibited, but none equalled the performance of Adjutant De Berenger, who out of seven successive shots, at 200 yards, without a rest, hit the bull’s eye six times, five of them in succession.”
By the day of the match, held at Stamford race course, the stipulation to fire without the use of a rest had mysteriously slipped, at least on the part of the Cumberlands. Curiously, Adjutant De Berenger, who was given a handsome medal by the corps for his feat of marksmanship on August 18th, was not at the competition on the 24th, on which the Sporting Magazine of 1811 ran a full report:“The Riflemen of Nottinghamshire having challenged all England to fire at a target, the same was accepted by the Yagers of the Honourable Artillery Company, and the Duke of Cumberland’s Sharp Shooters, for a stake of fifty guineas a side. The stipulations on the part of the Nottinghamshire Riflemen were – to fire from the shoulder, at the distance of two hundred yards.
The contending parties arrived in Stamford on Saturday, the 24th ult. and some excellent specimens of firing were exhibited during their practice on that day. Soon after ten o’clock on the following Monday morning, the combatants marched to the field (the race-ground near Stamford), in ‘battle array’; and the targets were fixed shortly after their arrival there. The firing (each man fired twelve shots) was not over until nearly six o’clock. The following is a correct statement of it:-
FIRST MATCH
The Nottinghamshire Riflemen.
Colonel Kirke 3 Shots
Mr Sharpe 5 do.
Mr Clarke 6 do.
Mr Habbijam 5 do.
Mr Thornton 2 do.
21 shots
The Artillery Company’s Yagers.
Mr Baumer 6 Shots
Mr Broadhurst 5 Shots
Lieutenant Davis 3 do.
Mr Garth 5 do.
Mr Waller 5 do.
Total 23 Shots
Majority for the Yagers, 2.
SECOND MATCH
The Nottinghamshire Riflemen.
Colonel Kirke 3 Shots
Mr Sharpe 4 do.
Mr Clark 4 do.
Mr Habbijam 3 do.
Mr Thornton 4 do.
Total 18 Shots.
The Duke of Cumberland’s Sharp Shooters
Total number of Shots 31
Majority for the Sharp Shooters, 13.
The members of the Duke of Cumberland’s Sharp Shooters who fired, were Messrs. Henderson, Bell, Charlton, Lynch, and Fenton.
The latter match is not to be considered as decided at present, inasmuch as the Duke of Cumberland’s Sharp Shooters made use of a rest from the body, contrary to the signed agreement, which stipulated that each man should ‘stand in an erect position, and fire fairly from the shoulder.’ The decision is to be referred to some persons competent to judge between the parties.”
The post-match booze-up in Stamford seems to have reflected this falling out. The Sharpshooters kept their own company at the Crown Inn, where they “spent the day with conviviality.” Down the road at The George, the Yagers and the Nottinghamshires shared a “sumptuous entertainment” of their own, culminating in the presentation of a silver medal by the former to the latter.
The assumed victory was celebrated in a satirical print, aggressively in support of the “victors”, published the following month by S W Fores, and titled: “The Challengers of All England Chopfallen, or the Cumberland Triumph.” (A copy is in the British Museum collection.)
Here the Sharpshooters look trim and dandyish in full dress, the Nottinghams dumpy and disconsolate in their round hats and trousers. The only appearance of the HAC Yagers seems to be the figure in the foreground who chases away a dog. A superscription notes that “The Notts took 2 hours and 40 minutes to fire their shots, in order to drive the Cumberland into the night, the Cumberland fired theirs in 43 minutes begining [sic] at a 1/4 past Five.”
A spectator comments: “Those queer looking Chaps are Robin Hoods Men, as they call themselves!” His wife replies: “Well I always thought Robin Hood and his Men had been Gentlemen!” A pie vendor cries: “Excellent Sharp Shooters Pyes! and Cumberland Nuts. I can’t recommend the Nottingham Cakes, the company says they are rather sour!” His customer replies: “Why Master Pyeman your a Wag, you had better take care what you say, the Colonels a Magistrate!”
The said Colonel Kirke complains: “It certainly must be oweing to the Belly Ache that I fired so bad. I never had such a belly ache in my life before. Gripe’d all night I assure you.” His companion says: “Why I say Coll! that man’s fireing with a rest damme if thats fair they shant have the stakes.” Rather enigmatically, a Sharpshooter comments: “Twigg the two Slings to their Guns!”
I’ve not been able to discover the nature of the “rest from the body” used by the Cumberlands, nor in what sense the Nottinghams’ guns may have had “two slings”. Can anyone advise?
The sharpshooting Adjutant Berenger of the Cumberlands was, of course, the fantasist and indefatigable self-publicist Charles Random, or “Charles Random de Berenger, Baron de Beaufain”, imprisoned for his part in the notorious Stock Exchange fraud of 1814. That same year the Sharpshooters morphed into a rifle club, resurfacing with the rifle volunteer movement of 1859 as the Victoria Rifles. Despite the Nottinghams’ “Robin Hood” tag, I’ve found nothing to suggest that the Robin Hood Rifles of 1859 traced their lineage to them. By the way, I do feel that “chopfallen” (crestfallen, dejected) is an old English term well worthy of revival.
Whether a “competent person” ever finally settled the dispute does not seem to be recorded.
July 8th, 2015 at 8:29 am
Dear Richard I enjoyed your post, the picture suggests that the Sharpshooters instead or extending the left arm as is usual they rested the elbow into the waist giving a steadier support to the rifle. As a shooter myself I do just that. Another possibility is to take the ramrod from the rifle and place the sharp end into the front ramrod pipe and rest the broader end into the waist this acts like a tripod and gives good support for steadier shooting
LikeLike
July 8th, 2015 at 9:56 am
Thanks Jim. I guess that the position you describe, tucking the elbow into the waist, would still have qualified as firing “from the shoulder” as required. But I like the ramrod theory! That could well be the “rest” that provoked the controversy …
LikeLike
August 10th, 2015 at 5:39 pm
Interesting, thanks for sharing. I recently purchased what I believe to be a needlework and watercolor of what I believe to be a representation of a member of the Duke of Cumberland’s Sharpshooters.
I based this on the https://www.flickr.com/photos/97667017@N05/9543521237/
The item may be viewed at https://www.flickr.com/photos/97667017@N05/9543521237/
and the reason is that I have a rifle made by Richard Fenton a member of that unit.
LikeLike
August 12th, 2015 at 11:03 am
Correction to Duke of Cumberland needlework link http://www.skinnerinc.com/auctions/2838M/lots/359
LikeLike
November 19th, 2015 at 10:16 am
Thanks indeed Richard for this. The Fenton who shot for the Duke of Cumberland Sharpshooters is my 3 x great grandfather, who was a gunmaker in Blackfriars, London from about 1785 to 1815. The print you’ve included also makes reference to ‘the Gun Maker’, who evidently shot so well at this contest that he was ‘huzzaed’ by the crowd, according to reports of the match. Your article adds some more colour to the day. Blackmores Dictionary of London Gunmakers makes reference to Richard Fenton winning a gold medal with the Sharpshooters – I’ve wondered if it was for this match but haven’t been able to find out. Thanks again
LikeLike
November 19th, 2015 at 12:49 pm
Rob, as I remarked on above I own and shoot one of your3xgg rifles. If you would like some photos I would be happy to supply. Send your email to steib@charter.net. Another example may be seen on the following; https://www.facebook.com/MuzzleLoadersAssociationOfGreatBritain/?ref=profile. Richard Fenton also patented platinum highlights to his rifles sights to increase their visibility. My rifle has these sights. Regards.
LikeLike
October 5th, 2016 at 2:52 pm
Dear Rob I realise your post was some time ago. I am intrigued that you are a descendant of Richard Fenton the Gunmaker. I am currently writing an article about him and would welcome correspondence with you. I have info you may be interested in and you may have some that I would like. my e-mail is historicdirks@aol.com Many thanks Jim Jackson
LikeLike
December 4th, 2015 at 1:30 pm
Rob, If you see this and while I know that Fenton is not an uncommon name I was wondering if the family interest in Volunteer riflemen was continued by this Roger Fenton: https://www.royalcollection.org.uk/search/site/hythe?f%5B0%5D=im_field_search_type%3A93201
LikeLike